Admitting That Your Estimate Was Too Optimistic
Six weeks estimated, ten needed: an IT team lead corrects his estimate before the steering group — openly, precisely, without excuses.
B2 · Monologue · 4 min · transcript, vocabulary & comprehension test
Admitting Your Estimate Was Too Optimistic
Six weeks estimated, ten needed: an IT team lead corrects his estimate before the steering group — openly, precisely, without excuses.
Tip: listen to the episode twice before you start the test.
✓ To the comprehension testYou may also like
Comprehension test
Listen first, then answer. No penalties — every explanation points to the moment in the conversation.
In English: I ___ for two weeks of testing.
The new estimate is ten weeks, and it is a ___ one: it includes a buffer of one full week, and it assumes the developers at sixty per cent availability, not eighty.
Transcript
Key phrases
Language notes
In this episode an IT team lead corrects his too optimistic estimate before the steering group: message first, then facts, three reasons, the new conservative number and the consequences. You learn the language of professional admission — and why "I calculated with two weeks" is wrong in English (level B2).
The admission first — before the numbers force it
Michael opens with the hardest sentence: "My estimate … was too optimistic." No backstory, no softening — "I will get straight to the point". The phrase "too optimistic" is deliberate: it names the error clearly but sounds more professional than "wrong" or "a mistake". His addition "before the numbers correct it for me" shows the principle behind it: report a misestimate yourself and you control the story; wait, and the story controls you.
The rechnen-mit trap: allow for, not calculate with
German "mit zwei Wochen rechnen" tempts a word-for-word "to calculate with two weeks" — but in English "calculate" describes the arithmetic itself, not the planning. The correct verbs are "to allow for two weeks", "to plan for" or "to expect". Michael corrects himself mid-sentence and even labels the trap ("as we would say in German") — an elegant technique when a Germanism slips out in a meeting.
Reasons, new number, consequences — the credibility chain
After the admission, Michael gives three precise reasons and explicitly owns the third ("this one is entirely on me"). Only that makes the new number credible: it is "conservative", contains a named buffer and rests on corrected assumptions. The close — three process changes and a weekly report — answers the question every steering group asks: why should we trust this estimate more than the last one?
Keep practising: Learn business English online — with real teachers from Simmonds, since 2004.
Frequently asked questions
What language level is this episode for?
Level B2 (CEFR). The monologue uses precise project English (estimate, buffer, conservative, legacy data); all eight key terms are explained bilingually.
How do I admit in English that my estimate was wrong?
In five steps: admission first ("my estimate was too optimistic"), state the facts, explain the reasons, present a conservative new number with a buffer, and say what you will change ("every estimate gets a second pair of eyes").
How do you say "mit etwas rechnen" in English?
For planning: "to allow for" or "to plan for" ("We allowed for two weeks of testing"). For expectations: "to expect". The word-for-word "to calculate with" is a typical German error.
Where can I practise situations like this live?
In the online business English courses from Simmonds Language Services (englisch-lehrer.com/online): live lessons with real teachers on Zoom, for companies and individuals across Germany — starting with a free consultation.
Is there a transcript to read along?
Yes, the full transcript with German support notes is on this page — listen first, then take the test, then read along.
Want to practise these phrases in a real conversation?
The podcast trains your ear — in our online lessons you practise the conversation yourself, with real teachers. For companies across Germany since 2004.