Responding to a Competitor's Much Lower Offer
The competitor is 22 per cent cheaper — and the client is ready to switch. How to respond with confidence without matching the price (level C1).
Tip: listen to the episode twice before you start the test. · Worksheet (PDF)
✓ To the comprehension testYou may also like
Comprehension test
Listen first, then answer. No penalties — every explanation points to the moment in the conversation.
___ we pay for the premium tier.
Then we're not comparing like with ___.
Transcript
Key phrases
Language notes
In this episode an account manager counters a rival offer that is 22 per cent cheaper — without matching the price: first clarifying scope ("comparing like with like"), then restructuring instead of discounting, finally arming the client with material for her board. Plus the aktuell/actually false friend mid-negotiation (level C1).
Questions before numbers: the scope check
James's first reaction is not a defence but a question: "May I ask a few questions before I respond?" At C1 level you justify this delay elegantly — "I'd be doing you a disservice if I reacted to a number without understanding what's behind it." The scope check reveals that the rival quote only includes standard support: "Then we're not comparing like with like." That devalues the 22 per cent gap before prices are even discussed.
Restructuring instead of discounting
Matching the price signals the old price was inflated — and destroys the margin. James takes the C1 alternative: a clear "I won't match their price" with a reason (hidden service cuts would hurt the client herself), followed by a restructured package of term length, moderate discount and a price cap ("a clause that caps any future price increase at inflation"). And he sells not to Katharina but through her: the one-page comparison is her ammunition for the board — including switching costs that swallow the competitor's discount.
aktuell ≠ actually: the false friend at the critical moment
Katharina's "Actually, we pay you for the premium tier" makes James sit up: "actually" means "in fact" and in English often signals a correction or surprise — he suspects a contract change. She meant "aktuell", i.e. "currently" or "at the moment". In price negotiations the difference is delicate: "Actually, we pay 900" sounds like a correction, "Currently, we pay 900" like a status open to change. Rule of thumb: aktuell = currently, actually = tatsächlich.
Keep practising: Learn business English online — with real teachers from Simmonds, since 2004.
Frequently asked questions
What language level is this episode for?
Level C1 (CEFR). The dialogue uses nuanced negotiation English — including idioms like "doing you a disservice" and "comparing like with like"; all eight key phrases are explained bilingually.
How do I respond to a cheaper competitor offer in English?
In four steps: ask questions instead of reacting instantly ("May I ask a few questions before I respond?"), compare the scope ("Are we comparing like with like?"), restructure instead of matching the price, and give the client material to defend the decision internally.
What is the difference between German "aktuell" and "actually"?
German "aktuell" is "currently" or "at the moment" in English. "Actually" means "in fact" and often signals a correction. "Actually, we pay 900" therefore sounds like a correction — what is usually meant is "Currently, we pay 900".
Where can I practise negotiation situations like this live?
In the online business English courses from Simmonds Language Services (englisch-lehrer.com/online): live lessons with real teachers on Zoom, for companies and individuals across Germany — starting with a free consultation.
Are the voices real?
Episodes are produced with high-quality AI voices (Hume) and editorially reviewed by our trainer team — the same method as our interactive lessons.
Want to practise these phrases in a real conversation?
The podcast trains your ear — in our online lessons you practise the conversation yourself, with real teachers. For companies across Germany since 2004.