Separating Must-Haves from Nice-to-Haves in a Contract
Before any contract negotiation: which terms are essential, which are trading material? The exercise that decides the outcome.
Must-Haves vs. Nice-to-Haves in a Contract
Tip: listen to the episode twice before you start the test.
✓ To the comprehension testYou may also like
Comprehension test
Listen first, then answer. No penalties — every explanation points to the moment in the conversation.
The liability cap is ___ for us.
Many German speakers translate 'wir müssen das nicht bekommen' as 'we ___ get it'.
Transcript
Key phrases
Language notes
In this episode a head of procurement explains the key preparation exercise before contract negotiations: sorting every term into must-haves and nice-to-haves, fixing walk-away points in advance and trading nice-to-haves instead of giving them away. You learn the C1 phrases — and why German "müssen nicht" is never "must not".
The language of the two lists
The method has a fixed vocabulary: "must-have" and "nice-to-have" for the sorting, "walk-away point" for the limit, "bargaining chip" for the trading material. The trading sentence always follows the same pattern: "We could drop X — if, in return, you extend Y." Leave out the second half and you are giving your capital away.
Cultural note: firmness without emotion
German negotiators like to explain at length why a term is essential — in English-speaking business, exactly that reads as an invitation to attack. The English convention is the neutral statement of fact: "The liability cap is non-negotiable for us", said calmly, said once, without apology. The shorter the sentence, the more stable the position.
Must not vs. don't have to
The most dangerous grammar mistake in contract talks: German "müssen nicht" (= no obligation) becomes a literal "must not" — which expresses a prohibition. "We must not include the training day" means the training day is forbidden. The intended meaning was "We don't have to include the training day." In contracts this difference can get expensive; "need not" is the formal alternative to "don't have to".
Keep practising: Learn business English online — with real teachers from Simmonds, since 2004.
Frequently asked questions
What language level is this episode for?
Level C1 (CEFR). The monologue uses precise contract and negotiation English; the vocabulary list explains all eight key terms bilingually.
How do I separate must-haves from nice-to-haves?
A must-have is a term you would not sign without (e.g. liability cap, delivery guarantee). A nice-to-have improves the contract but is expendable. Rule of thumb: if everything feels essential, your preparation is not finished.
Does German "wir müssen nicht" translate as "we must not"?
No — that is the classic trap. "Must not" expresses a prohibition. German "müssen nicht" is "don't have to" or, formally, "need not": no obligation, but permitted.
Is there a transcript to read along?
Yes, the full transcript with German support notes is on this page — listen first, then take the test, then read along.
Where can I practise contract negotiations live in English?
In the online business English courses from Simmonds Language Services (englisch-lehrer.com/online): live lessons with real teachers on Zoom, including negotiation role-plays. Book a free consultation.
Want to practise these phrases in a real conversation?
The podcast trains your ear — in our online lessons you practise the conversation yourself, with real teachers. For companies across Germany since 2004.